Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Article

No. 9 (2025): Dossier: "Mimesis in Philosophy and Literature"

The Long Century of Mimesis: The Representation of Reality and the Concern for Style in 19th Century

DOI
https://doi.org/10.64957/nesir.1802910
Submitted
07.08.2025
Published
23.10.2025

Abstract

The nineteenth-century is widely recognized as a key period in Western art history, during which the dominant traditional trends in the representation of reality were deeply questioned and transformed. Even a cursory glance at the major paintings of the time reveals striking differences in both attitude and technique between the academic approach that prevailed at the beginning of the century and the modernist styles that marked the last decades. According to a classic narrative, the Romantics’ emphasis on expressing the artist’s inner life at the expense of the mimesis of nature laid the groundwork for subsequent transformations. My goal in this article is to search for a satisfactory explanation for the changes in nineteenth-century approaches to mimesis, without relying on a clear opposition between mimesis and expression that the classic narrative may imply. I mainly argue for a narrative centered on the artists’ pursuit of original modes of expression and distinctive temperaments, which I will briefly name as a “concern for style.” This alternative framework, I suggest, offers a better standpoint than the “mimesis vs. expression” opposition and the resulting narrative. To support this claim, I will begin by examining the transformation of French painting, focusing in particular on Eugène Delacroix and his influential advocate Charles Baudelaire. Through their works and ideas, I will explore how the diminishing centrality of mimesis can be understood in more nuanced terms. In the second part, I will introduce and elaborate on the idea of the “concern for style” as the central component of my argument, once again drawing primarily on Delacroix and Baudelaire. Finally, I will turn to some prominent “Realist” figures—most notably Gustave Flaubert—to show that the concern for style has been as central for them as it has been for the Romantics. In this way, I aim to show that this concern provides a good interpretive framework for understanding the nineteenth-century art as a whole.

References

  1. Abrams, Meyer Howard. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford University Press, 1971.
  2. Antmen, Ahu, ed. 20. Yüzyıl Batı Sanatında Akımlar. Sel Yayıncılık, 2024.
  3. Baudelaire, Charles. “1846 Salonu.” Modern Hayatın Ressamı içinde, çeviren Ali Berktay. İletişim Yayınları, 2021.
  4. Beardsley, Monroe Curtis. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. University of Alabama Press, 1991.
  5. Beiser, Frederick C. The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Harvard University Press, 2010.
  6. Beistegui, Miguel de. Aesthetics After Metaphysics: From Mimesis to Metaphor. Routledge, 2014.
  7. Brooks, Peter. Realist Vision. Yale University Press, 2005.
  8. Danto, Arthur C. Sanatın Sonundan Sonra: Çağdaş Sanat ve Tarihin Sınır Çizgisi. Çeviren Zeynep Demirsü. Ayrıntı Yayınları, 2010.
  9. Eksen, Kerem. “Nietzsche’de Karakterin Üslubu.” Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi (2020): 43-62, https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.787960
  10. Flaubert, Gustave. Correspondance. Editör Bernard Masson. Collection Folio. Gallimard, 1998.
  11. Frascina, Francis, Charles Harrison, ve Paul Deirdre, ed. Modern Art and Modernism: A Critical Anthology. Westview Press, 1982.
  12. Gombrich, E. H. Sanatın Öyküsü. 9. bsk. Çeviren Erol Erduran ve Ömer Erduran. Remzi Kitabevi, 2015.
  13. Greenberg, Clement. “Modernist Painting.” Modern Art and Modernism içinde. Routledge, 1982. Halliwell, Stephen. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton University Press, 2002.
  14. Harrison, Charles, Paul Wood ve Jason Gaiger, ed. Art in Theory, 1815-1900: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
  15. Iknayan, Marguerite. The Concave Mirror. From Imitation to Expression in French Esthetic Theory 1800-1830. Stanford French and Italian Studies, Anma Libri, 1983.
  16. Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Editör Rolf-Peter Horstmann. Çeviren Judith Norman. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  17. ———. The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs. Editör Bernard Williams. Çeviren Josefine Nauckhoff ve Adrian Del Caro. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  18. Noon, Patrick. “What is Delacroix?” Delacroix: and the Rise of Modern Art içinde, editör Patrick Noon ve Christopher Riopelle. National Gallery London, 2015.
  19. Potolsky, Matthew. Mimesis. The New Critical Idiom. Routledge, 2006.
  20. Riopelle, Christopher. “Afterlife: Delacroix’s Posthumous Fame.” Delacroix: and the Rise of Modern Art içinde, 2015.
  21. Shiff, Richard. “Expression: Natural, Personal, Pictorial.” A Companion to Art Theory içinde, editör Paul Smith ve Carolyn Wilde. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
  22. Williams, Robert. Art Theory: An Historical Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.